<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>centresource interactive agency blog &#187; opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.centresource.com/tag/opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.centresource.com</link>
	<description>web development &#124; nashville, tn</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Progressive Enhancements with CSS3</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2010/06/14/progressive-enhancements-with-css3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2010/06/14/progressive-enhancements-with-css3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Travis Roberts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSS3 is great! The themers and designers here at centresource all love the improvements that are now available to (most) modern browsers. The best part of CSS3 is that the changes are subtle, and a site can still look fantastic without using any of the new styles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS3 is great! The themers and designers here at centresource all love the improvements that are now available to (most) modern browsers. The best part of CSS3 is that the changes are subtle, and a site can still look fantastic without using any of the new styles.</p>
<p>The idea of &#8220;progressive enhancement&#8221; is to get a site looking the way to want in all of the current browsers, then add some enhancements that most of those browsers can understand. It&#8217;s kind of like a bonus for the users of the more progressive browsers. Since they are savvy enough to know what browsers are on top, they can reap the rewards of the polish that CSS3 allows for a website.</p>
<h3>Border Radius</h3>
<p><strong>Supported Browsers</strong>: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE9</p>
<p>Border-radius is probably the most useful of the CSS3 attributes. It allows you to add rounded corners to any box item. Using this new property saves a lot of time and divs from the old way of achieving rounded corners with background images. The great thing about border-radius is that it works in all of the major browsers (I&#8217;m not including Opera in this category) except IE8 and below. So, most likely, the majority of your site visitors will see your snazzy rounded corners.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1889" title="border-radius" src="http://blog.centresource.com/wordpress/../wp-content/uploads/2010/06/border-radius.png" alt="border-radius" width="500" height="85" /></p>
<p>You can also target specific corners.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1890" title="border-radius-top-left" src="http://blog.centresource.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/border-radius-top-left.png" alt="border-radius-top-left" width="500" height="84" /></p>
<p>Notice that we use the <kbd>border-radius</kbd> attribute (which will eventually be the standard, and which Chrome already understands), but we also include the proprietary attributes <kbd>-moz-border-radius</kbd> for Firefox and <kbd>-webkit-border-radius</kbd> for Safari.</p>
<h3>Text Shadow</h3>
<p><strong>Supported Browsers</strong>: Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari</p>
<p>By far my favorite method for adding that last little bit of polish to your site. It&#8217;s amazing how much better a heading or body text looks with a subtle text-shadow added to it. I think it adds a nice level of depth to the text.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-1888 alignnone" title="text-shadow" src="http://blog.centresource.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/text-shadow.png" alt="text shadow example" width="500" height="75" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s as simple as adding the following line to your CSS:</p>
<p><code>text-shadow:1px 1px #ddd;</code></p>
<h3>RGBA</h3>
<p><strong>Supported Browsers</strong>: Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari, IE9</p>
<p>Another great example of a progressive enhancement that makes a site look great, but one that a user of an old browser won&#8217;t miss. RGBA just allows to you define a color with an opacity value (between 0.0 and 1.0) for any place you would normally use a regular RGB color (or hex color). It&#8217;s main uses are for making background or text colors semi-transparent.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1892" title="rgba" src="http://blog.centresource.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/rgba.png" alt="rgba" width="500" height="102" /></p>
<h3>Closing Thoughts</h3>
<p>Using CSS3 to add subtle enhancements to your site is a great way to reward your forward-thinking users who are smart enough to run the latest web browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2010/06/14/progressive-enhancements-with-css3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/10/24/firefox-20/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/10/24/firefox-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wage</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox-2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/2006/10/24/firefox-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a quick review of Firefox 2.0. I am not terribly impressed &#8212; with Firefox itself, or the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a <a  href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_20_review.php">quick review</a> of Firefox 2.0. I am not terribly impressed &#8212; with Firefox itself, or the review for that matter:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The first thing that stands out in the new Firefox is the more modern, snappier look and feel. Everything is more shinny, more playful and more clickable.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Can anyone tell me what this means? This is followed by:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Tabbed browsing was a major browser innovation that Firefox popularized
</p></blockquote>
<p>No. Opera popularized tabs. But that&#8217;s a forgiveable mistake. It looks like Firefox 2.0 will of course be a decent browser and a vastly superior choice to even IE 7, but it doesn&#8217;t look substantially different from Firefox 1.5. This appears to be a &#8220;hey let&#8217;s make this a major number release for some reason&#8221; release &#8212; i.e. marketing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll continue to stick with Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/10/24/firefox-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 9 Beta Cookies Bug</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/05/03/opera-9-beta-cookies-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/05/03/opera-9-beta-cookies-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wage</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web-browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/2006/05/03/opera-9-beta-cookies-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would be trying out Opera 9 beta right about now, but it appears that the cookies bug described here...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be trying out Opera 9 beta right about now, but it appears that the cookies bug described <a  href="http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-9tp2-cookies-bug/">here</a> has been made worse with Opera 9 Beta. The workaround no longer works at all.</p>
<p>I posted as much <a  href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=136900&#038;t=1146713124&#038;page=1">here</a>. I&#8217;m hoping this gets fixed soon &#8212; I wasn&#8217;t surprised to see this in a technology preview, but it&#8217;s a little unnverving to see it in a beta. It&#8217;s a minor issue, but one that prevents me from trying it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/05/03/opera-9-beta-cookies-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 9 Beta</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/04/25/opera-9-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/04/25/opera-9-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wage</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Company News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera-9-beta]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/2006/04/25/opera-9-beta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the Opera 9 Beta is out.
Get it while it&#8217;s hot!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the <a  href="http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/900b1/">Opera 9 Beta</a> is out.</p>
<p>Get it while it&#8217;s hot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/04/25/opera-9-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera ACID2 History</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/12/opera-acid2-history/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/12/opera-acid2-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wage</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ACID2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/12/opera-acid2-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A concise history of Opera&#8217;s ACID2 results. Pretty funny. (And impressive!)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a  href="http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/operaStuff/acid/">concise history</a> of Opera&#8217;s ACID2 results. Pretty funny. (And impressive!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/12/opera-acid2-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera 9TP2 Cookies bug</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-9tp2-cookies-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-9tp2-cookies-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 07:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wage</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology-preview]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web-browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-9tp2-cookies-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem I alluded to in my brief review of Opera 9.0 TP2 is simple: In the site-specific preferences, if...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I alluded to in my <a  href="http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-90-tp2/">brief review</a> of Opera 9.0 TP2 is simple: In the site-specific preferences, if you set the default to &#8220;Never accept cookies&#8221; &#8212; it does just that, ignoring your site-specific exclusions. This appears to be because although the option to honor your site-specific prefs is still there, they just .. forgot to let you select it in the UI.</p>
<p>So, as <a  href="http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=123132">discussed here</a>, all you have to do is manually edit your opera6.ini to set your cookie preferences how you want them and leave it alone. The table of values for &#8220;Enable Cookies&#8221; can be <a  href="http://my.opera.com/burnout426/homes/files/cookietable.html">found here</a>.</p>
<p>Naturally, this won&#8217;t be an issue in the official release, but for all you bleeding-edgers like myself, this tip may come in handy until the bug is fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.centresource.com/2006/03/04/opera-9tp2-cookies-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
