<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Confederacy of OSes, Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii</link>
	<description>the thoughts and ramblings of centresource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Holland</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eli,
I actually installed Cygwin and mintty, and have been using that as a base windows shell environment for the time being so I can use most of my existing bash scripts. For the most part, that&#039;s been perfectly fine, and mintty has fullscreen and all that jazz. I&#039;ll definitely look into OpenBox, though. As far as hackintoshes go, I may yet build one, but the whole purpose of changing oses was so I don&#039;t have to fight the OS for control of the hardware, and trying to force OSX onto non-Apple hardware seems like it&#039;d be an uphill battle in that regard. :)
- Jeremy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli,<br />
I actually installed Cygwin and mintty, and have been using that as a base windows shell environment for the time being so I can use most of my existing bash scripts. For the most part, that&#8217;s been perfectly fine, and mintty has fullscreen and all that jazz. I&#8217;ll definitely look into OpenBox, though. As far as hackintoshes go, I may yet build one, but the whole purpose of changing oses was so I don&#8217;t have to fight the OS for control of the hardware, and trying to force OSX onto non-Apple hardware seems like it&#8217;d be an uphill battle in that regard. :)<br />
- Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Hooten</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Hooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#039;ve never done this (I&#039;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx

This won&#039;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#039;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#039;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too...it&#039;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So...that&#039;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.


 2 -  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#039;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.


 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting. I think you&#039;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.


 Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#039;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#039;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.



(also, viewing parts I &amp; II...have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#039;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#8217;ve never done this (I&#8217;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: <a href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx</a></p>
<p>This won&#8217;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#8217;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#8217;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too&#8230;it&#8217;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So&#8230;that&#8217;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.</p>
<p> 2 &#8211;  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#8217;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.</p>
<p> 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting</a>. I think you&#8217;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.</p>
<p> Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#8217;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#8217;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.</p>
<p>(also, viewing parts I &amp; II&#8230;have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#8217;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Hooten</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Hooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#039;ve never done this (I&#039;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx

This won&#039;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#039;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#039;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too...it&#039;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So...that&#039;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.


 2 -  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#039;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.


 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting. I think you&#039;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.


 Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#039;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#039;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.



(also, viewing parts I &amp; II...have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#039;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#8217;ve never done this (I&#8217;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: <a href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx</a></p>
<p>This won&#8217;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#8217;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#8217;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too&#8230;it&#8217;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So&#8230;that&#8217;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.</p>
<p> 2 &#8211;  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#8217;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.</p>
<p> 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting</a>. I think you&#8217;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.</p>
<p> Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#8217;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#8217;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.</p>
<p>(also, viewing parts I &amp; II&#8230;have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#8217;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Hooten</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Hooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#039;ve never done this (I&#039;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx

This won&#039;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#039;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#039;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too...it&#039;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So...that&#039;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.


 2 -  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#039;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.


 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting. I think you&#039;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.


 Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#039;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#039;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.



(also, viewing parts I &amp; II...have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#039;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Grab yourself Console2 for Windows and use it to launch PuTTY for you. Then you get the awesomeness that is Console2 with the ease of PuTTY ( I think). I&#8217;ve never done this (I&#8217;m mainly an Ubuntu Server user), but I *think* this is possible. Check out the comments in this blog post and see if it gets you where you need to be: <a href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Console2ABetterWindowsCommandPrompt.aspx</a></p>
<p>This won&#8217;t prevent the terrible Aero glass chrome, but you&#8217;ll get a much better looking and more usable console that acts like you&#8217;d expect it to coming from a unix terminal. That terrible chrome is still lurking in Windows 8, too&#8230;it&#8217;s just a solid color instead of semitransparent. So&#8230;that&#8217;s a plus if you hate opacity I guess.</p>
<p> 2 &#8211;  4) Sadly, I know of nothing that will get Redmond to reduce the cost of Windows, or prevent restart on update. I wish I could :(. In terms of cost, you could weight the pros and cons of an MSDN subscribership, but then you&#8217;re just mitigating costs elsewhere.</p>
<p> 3) Ruby is the answer, sir. Most of the time. Write your scripts using ruby and run them from the command line: <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166347/how-do-i-use-ruby-for-shell-scripting</a>. I think you&#8217;d be surprised how robust this approach is for most cases. Then again, I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re doing with your shell scripts, so YMMV.</p>
<p> Protip: Throw OpenBox over that Ubuntu Server setup you&#8217;ve got going. Then you can configure your window manager to be as simple or robust as necessary, totally tailored to you. There&#8217;s configuration overhead, but the end result is pure productivity Nirvana. Drop me a line if you decide to do this and need some sample configuration files.</p>
<p>(also, viewing parts I &amp; II&#8230;have you looked into a Hackintosh? It&#8217;s getting pretty easy to go that route, and is at least worth looking into is OSX is your most productive OS. All the fun of OSX without the price gouging :) ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Stauter</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Stauter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Stauter</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Stauter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Stauter</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2012/10/19/a-confederacy-of-oses-part-iii/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Stauter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=4452#comment-911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re really intent on Windows, you should look into PowerShell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
