<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSSOff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cssoff</link>
	<description>the thoughts and ramblings of centresource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natahn Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Natahn Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=3885#comment-1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news. I think its going to be tough. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news. I think its going to be tough. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natahn Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Natahn Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=3885#comment-902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news. I think its going to be tough. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news. I think its going to be tough. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwitchUp Studios</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>SwitchUp Studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=3885#comment-1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We (SwitchUp Studios) used PNG8 and PNG24 images that we then ran through a compressor and got all images done to less then 750kb, which have them much higher fidelity then GIFS. We then solved the problem of IE6 support of alpha traspanency by simply including the texture in most of the transparent images, which in most cases didn&#039;t increase file size and in others decreased file size. 

Using a png8/24 compressor instead of photoshops export for web, actually cut our images from 2250kb down to 750kb, 66% less then the original. 

I wish the best for all of us in this competition :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (SwitchUp Studios) used PNG8 and PNG24 images that we then ran through a compressor and got all images done to less then 750kb, which have them much higher fidelity then GIFS. We then solved the problem of IE6 support of alpha traspanency by simply including the texture in most of the transparent images, which in most cases didn&#8217;t increase file size and in others decreased file size. </p>
<p>Using a png8/24 compressor instead of photoshops export for web, actually cut our images from 2250kb down to 750kb, 66% less then the original. </p>
<p>I wish the best for all of us in this competition :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwitchUp Studios</title>
		<link>http://blog.centresource.com/2011/12/13/cssoff/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>SwitchUp Studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centresource.com/?p=3885#comment-901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We (SwitchUp Studios) used PNG8 and PNG24 images that we then ran through a compressor and got all images done to less then 750kb, which have them much higher fidelity then GIFS. We then solved the problem of IE6 support of alpha traspanency by simply including the texture in most of the transparent images, which in most cases didn&#039;t increase file size and in others decreased file size. 

Using a png8/24 compressor instead of photoshops export for web, actually cut our images from 2250kb down to 750kb, 66% less then the original. 

I wish the best for all of us in this competition :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (SwitchUp Studios) used PNG8 and PNG24 images that we then ran through a compressor and got all images done to less then 750kb, which have them much higher fidelity then GIFS. We then solved the problem of IE6 support of alpha traspanency by simply including the texture in most of the transparent images, which in most cases didn&#8217;t increase file size and in others decreased file size. </p>
<p>Using a png8/24 compressor instead of photoshops export for web, actually cut our images from 2250kb down to 750kb, 66% less then the original. </p>
<p>I wish the best for all of us in this competition :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
